How did "enlightened absolutism" differ from traditional forms of absolutism?

"Enlightened absolutism" represents a unique blend of absolute monarchy and Enlightenment philosophy. Unlike traditional forms of absolutism, which were characterized by rulers asserting their power without regard for the welfare of their subjects, enlightened absolutism sought to incorporate the rational and progressive ideas emerging from the Enlightenment into governance. This meant that rulers would not only hold absolute power but also apply reason and promote reforms in various areas such as education, legal systems, and social policies.

For example, enlightened absolutists like Frederick the Great of Prussia or Catherine the Great of Russia endeavored to implement reforms aimed at modernizing their states while retaining their ultimate authority. They believed that by embracing Enlightenment principles, they could strengthen their rule and contribute to the betterment of society.

Other options present ideas that do not accurately represent the nature of enlightened absolutism. The rejection of governance, proposed in one option, does not align with the concept, as enlightened absolutism involves a form of governance rather than an absence of it. Additionally, emphasizing democratic ideals or completely abolishing monarchy also diverges from the essence of enlightened absolutism, which maintains monarchical authority while integrating reformist ideas.